Technology

Why Michigan's Jaishawn Barham wasn't ejected for hitting helmet into official's head

2025-11-29 17:48
988 views
Why Michigan's Jaishawn Barham wasn't ejected for hitting helmet into official's head

This was a weird one.

Why Michigan's Jaishawn Barham wasn't ejected for hitting helmet into official's headStory byBilly HeyenSat, November 29, 2025 at 5:48 PM UTC·1 min read

Why Michigan's Jaishawn Barham wasn't ejected for hitting helmet into official's head originally appeared on The Sporting News. Add The Sporting News as a Preferred Source by clicking here.

Michigan took a 6-0 lead on Ohio State in The Game thanks to two field goals.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

That's when the Buckeyes put their first substantial drive together.

And after one play down near the goal line, Michigan's Jaishawn Barham wasn't happy.

He got into a heated discussion with one of the officials, and at the end of it, he appeared to softly headbutt the official in the head.

It was called unsportsmanlike conduct, but there was no ejection.

MORE: The new Stranger Things character was also an MLB All Star with the Brewers

Why wasn't Michigan's Jaishawn Barham ejected?

It appears the officiating crew just got this one wrong.

A player is supposed to be ejected for contacting an official like that.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement

But the head referee and his cohorts apparently decided this wasn't the time to do that.

MORE: You have to see Tyrese Maxey at the National Dog Show

Fox color commentator Joel Klatt was shocked that Barham wasn't ejected.

It could prove crucial, as Barham is a key defender for the Wolverines.

More news:

  • Baylor Scheierman's stats as a high school QB are insane

  • Olympic sensation Quincy Wilson commits to a Big Ten school

  • LeBron passes Michael in a stat that means nothing in the GOAT debate

  • Caitlin Clark might be the reason Steph Curry left Under Armour

  • Shedeur Sanders given Barack Obama-level praise by NBA champion

  • Travis Kelce showed off his style with a $526,000 watch

AdvertisementAdvertisement