- Money
Salary-sacrificed pension contributions above an annual £2,000 threshold will no longer be exempt from national insurance from April 2029.
Vicky ShawWednesday 26 November 2025 14:45 GMT
open image in galleryThe Government should carefully consider the long-term individual and societal consequences of changes to salary sacrifice, a finance expert said (Dominic Lipinski/PA) (PA Archive)
Sign up to our free money newsletter for investment analysis and expert advice to help you build wealth
Sign up to our free money email for help building your wealth
Sign up to our free money email for help building your wealth
Email*SIGN UPI would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
Workers and employers will feel the “pain” from a £2,000 salary sacrifice cap on pensions announced in the Budget, finance experts have said.
Fears were raised that employers would make workplace schemes less generous and that people’s long-term financial security would be eroded.
The change means that salary-sacrificed pension contributions above an annual £2,000 threshold will no longer be exempt from national insurance from April 2029.
Contributions above £2,000 will be treated as ordinary employee pension contributions in the tax system and therefore be subject to both employer and employee national insurance contributions.
A document, released by the Office for Budget Responsibility in error ahead of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s Budget speech, said: “The policy results in an increase in NICs (national insurance contributions), which is estimated to raise £4.7 billion in 2029/30 and £2.6 billion in 2030/31.
“The costing assumes that, in most cases, employee pension contributions above £2,000 that were part of a salary-sacrifice scheme will become subject to employer and employee NICs, either because they move to a standard pension scheme or continue in a salary-sacrifice scheme under the new tax arrangements.”
Employers may offer salary sacrifice as part of their pension scheme as a tax-efficient way to help workers boost their pots.
The schemes enable people to maintain their take-home pay, as people end up paying lower NI contributions.
There are also NI advantages for employers, helping them to offer more generous workplace benefits.
Tess Page, UK wealth strategy leader at Mercer, said: “The Government should carefully consider the long-term individual and societal consequences of these changes.”
Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.
Terms and conditions apply.
Go to websiteADVERTISEMENT
Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.
Terms and conditions apply.
Go to websiteADVERTISEMENT
She added: “Unless retirement saving incentives remain effective and employers can continue to support their employees’ long-term financial wellbeing, the state will end up shouldering an even greater burden.”
Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister who is now a partner at consultants LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), said there was a high risk that the changes could raise a smaller amount than expected.
He said: “The decision not to implement this change until 2029 creates a huge opportunity for firms to restructure the way that they offer pay and pensions in order to mitigate or eliminate this new charge.
“There is a high probability that this policy will only raise a fraction of the amount expected by the Chancellor.”
Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at wealth manager Quilter, described the cap as “a deeply misguided move”.
He said: “At a time when the Government acknowledges that tomorrow’s pensioners risk being poorer than today’s, policy should be focused on incentivising saving and not dismantling one of the most effective tools we have.
“Salary sacrifice has long been a cornerstone of workplace pension strategies, helping millions boost contributions and plan with confidence.
“Restricting it will inevitably lead to cutbacks. A survey of 267 of our customers in October found one in four (25%) said they would stop using salary sacrifice if tax benefits were reduced or removed, while nearly one in five (19%) said they would contribute less.
“That is a devastating prospect when we’re already sleepwalking into a retirement crisis. What the smorgasbord approach fails to recognise is that small tweaks can have huge behavioural impacts – and this one could harm millions of future retirements.
“Employers will also feel the pain. After last year’s increase in employer national insurance contributions, this represents a double whammy, removing flexibility to support staff saving and stretching reward budgets even further.
“That’s significant sums stripped from pay packets and business budgets, funds that could otherwise be invested in long-term financial security.”
Renny Biggins, head of policy – products and long-term savings at The Investing and Saving Alliance, said: “The Government is arm-wrestling itself over pensions. One hand recognises the retirement income crisis facing this country, while the other limits the very schemes used to incentivise pension contributions.
“This move will only further undermine pensions adequacy and retirement savings. We need to focus on encouraging, not penalising, saving into private pension pots.”
Claire Trott, head of advice at St James’s Place, said: “Pensions cannot deliver long-term security if the rules keep shifting every few years.”
Andrew Prosser, head of investments at InvestEngine, said: “People will need to review their workplace pension and maximise employer contributions wherever possible.”
Steven Cameron, pensions director at Aegon UK, said: “Those sacrificing more of today’s salary for a higher contribution towards their retirement income may question why the Chancellor is penalising them.”
Rebecca Williams, divisional lead of financial planning at Rathbones, said: “Capping salary sacrifice at £2,000 is a blunt instrument that risks doing more harm than good. It would strip away a key incentive for employers to boost pension contributions, undermine efforts to tackle the retirement savings gap, and pile extra costs on businesses already under pressure.
“Worse still, it sends the wrong signal at a time when we should be encouraging long-term financial resilience, not making it harder.”
Patrick Heath-Lay, chief executive officer of People’s Partnership, provider of People’s Pension, said: “Even with salary sacrifice capped at £2,000 from 2029, pensions remain strongly tax advantaged.”
He added: “We would urge pension savers not to mistake this change for a fundamental overhaul of the pension tax system: these changes should not dent confidence in pension saving.”
